If what you say is true then you do have a point, and if Thomy doesn't want to limit content to accounts that have worked for it then he is completely wrong.
77 slayer is close to nothing, it's easy in osrs even.
You really do have a point, when tarns came out I was so hyped to go and kill them because I knew the work it took me to get 95 slayer as a pure. Even the day one tarn loots were incredibly stupid compared to lower level slayer monsters.
It kinda is a bit demoralizing to find out that your slayer level is useless, and makes slayer only useful to get a cape.To achieve the max, to get the cape..
There should be bosses that are linked to high level slayer, bosses that have good drops and exp. And are actually a bit challenging to kill.
Slayer shouldnt be about killing fairly easily monsters, you should have option to make it more rewarding and challenging when you progress in the skill.
Tarns as far as rare drops go, tarns are better than dark beasts. Dark beasts have a lot better non-rare drops. I do think both of their slayer requirements are fine. Tarns should just be made a little more convenient to fight. Their transformation is really annoying, you attack them and there's a good 2 seconds where you have to wait before you actually start damaging them. This should be changed.
No tarns should not be made "a little more convenient". You're going for 200m and you find it a probleem to kill level 95 slayer monsters that have a 2 second delay?
Like seriously, that point just makes me question why the hell would you even want 200m slayer if you dont like the challenge of it.
If you want something convient then log out and go sleep.
I can't wrap my head around why would you think that easy monsters as tarns are should be changed for having 2 second delay. They are already so easy.
They are level 95 slayer monsters, in my mind 95 should offer you even harder monsters than monsters that you can safespot with prayer.
And here you are, already thinking that a level 95 slayer monster which is fairly easy to kill should be made more "convenient" smh