1
Register now to gain access to all of our forum features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies, send private messages, manage your profile, chat with other players in the shoutbox and much more. Once you sign in, this message will disappear.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
That makes no sense. The numbers show what % of the age group took part in voting. i.e from males/women aged 18-24, only 36% voted, either in or out. Anyways, the more elders there are, the smaller the participation % should be, and that proves even more that elders are more interested.sooooooooooooI did x) @Ekke, you do know that the amount of people in the world is growing insane amounts each year? It's called population aging. It means that there are more older people than younger people. So obviouly not everyone votes no matter what is put on poll, and the percentage is that much different simply because there are too many old people.
who else stopped reading
"refuse to rely on plain evidence that is being given to" -> example?
I give you examples of the NHS and you say (I quote) "So the NHS money promise alone created the whole huge turnaround? "; I will explain this to you again, they promised over 300 MILLION pounds and billboarded their campaign around this main promise, and ONLY tell the truth about it (obviously that it's not going to happen) after the supporters voted for it (NOT in the campaign, not before the referendum, BUT AFTER).
You think of this as a minor promise since you don't consider this as any relevant for a turnaround, where in fact it was one of the main points for the turnaround.
"You refuse to admit some things" -> example?
Read above.
I never refused to believe it. Putting words into my mouth again."You refuse to accept hard proof evidence such as the NHS and have the absolute rudeness, I must say, to call the promise of the NHS money scheme "just a thing"". I never refused to accept proof about NHS and I never called it just a thing. Why are you putting words into my mouth?
You spoke in plural, but only talked about one example, so I simply asked for more?
Quote "So the NHS money promise alone created the whole huge turnaround?" End Quote.
"that if the youth get more information than the elders, and literally get unfiltered (by the media) information,""and literally get unfiltered (by the media) information" Information given by the media is not unfiltered? It's filtered by the owners of newspapers, by the directors?
That's exactly what I said y'know? THAT THE ELDERS GET FILTERED INFORMATION FROM THE MEDIA (TV, NEWSPAPERS, you call them) WHEREAS THE YOUTH ARE MORE OPEN-MINDED DUE TO THE EXPOSURE TO A GREATER SCALE OF PROPER INFORMATION.
"and literally get unfiltered (by the media) information"
"information the elderly get is mostly coming from the TV media, where every information is controlled and fed to the mass like a shepherd controlling the sheeps"
So if the youngster gets information from the media, it's unfiltered, but if an elder gets it, it's suddenly controlled aka filtered?
Still doesn't explain how you are almight and know everything, including what elders know and what they do not."topic on which the elders simply don't have any clue about" How do you know that the elders don't have any clue about? Stop *insert quote* categorizing.
Second day after the debate people go out and claim "If I'd have known, I'd have voted otherwise. I wish I could vote again". This goes without saying, but if you want me to put it into words for you; they finally understood that a promise that could hardly come as trustworthy from the PM, but from some opposing side campaigner was revealed and understood unfortunately too late for them as a LIE.
I think that as you live more, you see more, you experience more, you understand more."based on ... years of, something?" That is called life experience.
You actually think that if you live 60 years you have the knowledge of all the subjects or something? Your argument is way invalid and very uncalled for.
Percentage of participants by age group."categorizing the elders as a whole, smarter than the youth, purely based on age factor." Not saying that elders are smarter. I'm saying that commonly elders interest more in politics than the common youngster. Sure there are a lot of exceptions, but mostly it is that way.
That is wrong, again. Why do you start on the presumption that elders are interested in politics? You actually consider that watching politicians on TV and newspaper and other media resources makes one interested in politics. If you think that the elders have nothing better or had nothing better to do with their lives other than wasting every day of their life actually looking into politics (other than tv feed), you are wrong.
What? No no no. Propaganda is made for the young people, old people don't fall for tricks. Elders are just more conservative than the youth, which is completely normal too.I think one of the big reasons elderly people voted out was because they were brainwashed by all the leave EU propaganda. Fake promises were made and younger people simply looked past the propaganda, not believing it.QuoteIt's actually disgusting seeing the amount of people my age saying the older generation don't deserve a say. My grandad is the most intelligent person I know and he voted out. I'd rather have someone who's seen what being in the EU has done to this country over the past years have a huge say in our vote than someone who's not been around long enough to see the damage that it has caused.
That's a quote from a close family member of mine, and I think she's absolutely right.
The damage? dude UK is the 5th economy of the world, but hey I am sure EU damaged it so badly.
Most of the elderly voted out because of the immigrants and the fascist communist ideas they still have, whereas the youth are way more opened to the globalization.
While it is true Cameron "gambled" A LOT on this action, it was never predicted as a lose, and only started to take the shape of a tight battle once the campaigning started and to be blunt the false promises that the Leave party made created this huge turnaround.Stop being so butthurt, please.
tl;dr while it true the PM David Cameron gambled probably too much on this, it is the stupid people, that believed this was the heaven and paradise promised within the Leave party, at fault.
https ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNxO9MpQ2vAShe's so amazing. I literally listened to her atleast 10 times in a row when i saw the video for the first time.
Unless you're a chameleon I think that it's rather difficult to aim at multiple enemies at onceIf those are guns then why are they facing different points, wouldn't it be logical if they were aimed into one?multiple enemies?