Emps-World Forum

Emps-World => General Discussion => Topic started by: Superkettu1 on March 08, 2015, 07:28:26 pm

Title: any1 else have PvM problems?
Post by: Superkettu1 on March 08, 2015, 07:28:26 pm
Some weeks ago there was update where monsters def was lowered. well even stupid can understand that then you should be able to kill MORE bosses per trip, right?

after that update i have experienced that actually you can do less boss kills per trip than b4 :O and im pretty sure that something got fkd up with that update....

Zammy: kills per trip got lowered from 5-7 to 3-5
Arma: 2-3 to 1 (rarely 2)
bandos: 2-3 to 1 (2)
smoke boss: 1-2 to 0-1
also it feels that WW is hitting more often than months ago.

So what i think happened is that also players def got lowered that 10% (was it 10%??) ------> bosses hit way more often to you----> less kills (tho i can feel bosses weaker def aswell)

OR

monsters accuracy got (accidentally) buffed.

am i only one who have felt it? please post ur own thougts/experience so i can know is smth wrong or am i just fkin r3tardd 8)



Title: Re: any1 else have PvM problems?
Post by: Vampyras on March 08, 2015, 08:31:49 pm
How do you even manage to kill 3 zammy boss per trip..I can do max 1 :D
Title: Re: any1 else have PvM problems?
Post by: Jimmyb13 on March 08, 2015, 08:55:39 pm
Yeah I noticed aswell
Title: Re: any1 else have PvM problems?
Post by: Joshiee on March 09, 2015, 11:42:03 am
I haven't noticed anything yet?
I've killed the Chaos Elemental and the KBD numerous time too.
Title: Re: any1 else have PvM problems?
Post by: Simonyoda3 on March 09, 2015, 01:35:09 pm
There was a bug which made bosses less likely to attack with magic and this was fixed a while ago. This is why the amount of kills you can achieve solo has been greatly reduced.
Title: Re: any1 else have PvM problems?
Post by: Chazz on March 09, 2015, 09:23:44 pm
There was a bug which made bosses less likely to attack with magic and this was fixed a while ago. This is why the amount of kills you can achieve solo has been greatly reduced.
I think that solves this case then?