Emps-World Forum
Emps-World => Feedback => Topic started by: Zudikas95187 on April 16, 2015, 11:45:01 am
-
so i kinda liked all things thomy updated on the last update, but there is one exception - the untradables loss in pvp.
no one will go pvp with ancient pvp, void and the weirdest thing is that ancient armor is basically for pking, and now you lose it in wilderness, seems legit lol.
-
You protect ancient PvP armour over like 90% of all items, also nobody skulls with ancient PvP gear so I don't see the problem here.
It's pretty much the same as before lol.
-
You protect ancient PvP armour over like 90% of all items, also nobody skulls with ancient PvP gear so I don't see the problem here.
It's pretty much the same as before lol.
how about void, there were a lot of void pkers, try to find at least one now???
-
You protect ancient PvP armour over like 90% of all items, also nobody skulls with ancient PvP gear so I don't see the problem here.
It's pretty much the same as before lol.
how about void, there were a lot of void pkers, try to find at least one now???
Exactly ^
How exactly was this aimed to improve pking? No one is going to want to risk their whole void set. This update basically just killed void pking, which many pkers loves.
-
You protect ancient PvP armour over like 90% of all items, also nobody skulls with ancient PvP gear so I don't see the problem here.
It's pretty much the same as before lol.
how about void, there were a lot of void pkers, try to find at least one now???
You're not supposed to PK at all when all you can afford is a str ammy and a whip. Looking forward to making people lose their void. :-*
-
You protect ancient PvP armour over like 90% of all items, also nobody skulls with ancient PvP gear so I don't see the problem here.
It's pretty much the same as before lol.
how about void, there were a lot of void pkers, try to find at least one now???
You're not supposed to PK at all when all you can afford is a str ammy and a whip. Looking forward to making people lose their void. :-*
The aim of the update was to increase PK activity. Now, do you really think that will make more people PK? Of course not.
-
Most void pkers wore a fire cape and a str (t) risk against bandos riskers.
-
You protect ancient PvP armour over like 90% of all items, also nobody skulls with ancient PvP gear so I don't see the problem here.
It's pretty much the same as before lol.
how about void, there were a lot of void pkers, try to find at least one now???
Exactly ^
How exactly was this aimed to improve pking? No one is going to want to risk their whole void set. This update basically just killed void pking, which many pkers loves.
Void should have never been able to pick back up in the first place, nobody wants to fight voiders because they have such high hits with 0 risks.
-
Voiders ruined pk, it was so op and if you only took dfs as a def boonus with void it was super op.
Back in the day we pked with void on zerkers, if you killed another voider he wouldnt COMe wild for a week cause hes grinding a new void set and thats how it should be.
It was fun and it was fair.
-
voiders didnt risk anything thats why maybe? :D f cape and str t story is wrong never seen voider risking str t and f cape :D
-
Voiders ruined pk, it was so op and if you only took dfs as a def boonus with void it was super op.
Back in the day we pked with void on zerkers, if you killed another voider he wouldnt COMe wild for a week cause hes grinding a new void set and thats how it should be.
It was fun and it was fair.
This.
Although this might have depopulated pking for the time-being, it is better this way; it's how it's supposed to be.
-
thank god for that. at least there wont be anymore of those bullshit str ammy and rune boots riskers anymore
-
ERMAHGERD PEOPLE FINALLY HAVE TO RISK SOMETHING IN WILDERNESS!!! THIS IS SO BAD FOR THE WHOLE GAME!!!!!!!! ASHDA69SD7FTT6AS9DTFA7S0DYFA78Y0DFG8U9SDFOLGDFÖHSHFGASDF8G79SD9FG
Shut up and deal with it.
-
You would never keep your void in old emps which is why I dont see this as a big deal. If you dont wanna lose it, dont risk it. If you want a strength advantage, then be prepared to do some work to get it back if you should lose it.
-
ERMAHGERD PEOPLE FINALLY HAVE TO RISK SOMETHING IN WILDERNESS!!! THIS IS SO BAD FOR THE WHOLE GAME!!!!!!!! ASHDA69SD7FTT6AS9DTFA7S0DYFA78Y0DFG8U9SDFOLGDFÖHSHFGASDF8G79SD9FG
Shut the fuck up and deal with it.
be a little more polite and tolerant when people say their opinions, or you will get moderated again.
-
ERMAHGERD PEOPLE FINALLY HAVE TO RISK SOMETHING IN WILDERNESS!!! THIS IS SO BAD FOR THE WHOLE GAME!!!!!!!! ASHDA69SD7FTT6AS9DTFA7S0DYFA78Y0DFG8U9SDFOLGDFÖHSHFGASDF8G79SD9FG
Shut the fuck up and deal with it.
be a little more polite and tolerant when people say their opinions, or you will get moderated again.
Who said I was ever unmoderated?
On-topic: Do you seriously think that it's absolutely fine that people hit constant 50's without risking anything? This just further proves that people cannot PK in this game without exploiting every flaw of the game.
-
Stop your bickering.
Thanks for the feedback.
-
It was a much needed update, there were far too many good items that could be used without risk. Pking is all about risk, there would be no reward without it. People using void barely risk anything, add in some other untradables and you're pretty much set to not lose anything if you die. While on the other hand, you get no loot if you kill someone. Isn't it much more satisfying to get some loot instead of a str ammy every kill? There were also a few items that no one really knew about, but shouldn't be able to be picked up on death.
For example: colour dbows, vigour and fury (t). If you don't PvP much, this doesn't affect you other than maybe combat/slayer exp rates, though those are subject to change if they got affected in a bad way.
(http://cdn.smosh.com/sites/default/files/ftpuploads/bloguploads/meme-tears-rainingtears.jpg)
Relevant.
-
thanks for your feedback for my feedback guys, i appreciate it!
now that i got some actual arguments to update this, i understand it more clearly, ima lock this now :).