Emps-World Forum

Miscellaneous => Debates => Topic started by: Ekke on January 30, 2016, 11:09:44 am

Title: 9/11
Post by: Ekke on January 30, 2016, 11:09:44 am
iz fake ???  ??? ??? ::) ::) :o :o :-X :-X :o :o

jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Il Skill L on January 30, 2016, 11:14:11 am


y not make a post about flat world, much more intriguing in my opinion  ::)
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Ekke on January 30, 2016, 11:18:20 am


y not make a post about flat world, much more intriguing in my opinion  ::)
yes next on my list

anyways, that vid has no evidence what so ever that the stick is even from steel kek
also, it's a stick.

how do you explain that 9/11 towers were the first towers in history to fall down because of a fire?
1945, plane flew into empire state building, it's still up

few months back, fire in dubai's hotel
still up?
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Il Skill L on January 30, 2016, 01:14:56 pm


y not make a post about flat world, much more intriguing in my opinion  ::)
yes next on my list

anyways, that vid has no evidence what so ever that the stick is even from steel kek
also, it's a stick.

how do you explain that 9/11 towers were the first towers in history to fall down because of a fire?
1945, plane flew into empire state building, it's still up

few months back, fire in dubai's hotel
still up?
I assume there is a slight difference if planes fly through the buildings and explode or the fire starts from curtains(which i guess happened in dubai?)

"also, it's a stick" Also he used his little finger instead of tons and tons weighting building + airplane.

Plane flew into the empire state building? Compare the planes from 1945 to the ones in 21st century. Quite a difference in construction and flying speed.
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Ekke on January 30, 2016, 01:39:06 pm

Quite a difference in jet fu... oh nvm. It's exactly the same thing.

Also, doesn't even make sense to make such an example but okay i can do it too: compare 1945 to 21th century. Quite a difference in the building's constructions? *cough* wtc twin towers were specially designed to take minimal damage from a plane crash *cough*
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Bubblebeam2 on January 30, 2016, 02:02:05 pm
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

......
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Il Skill L on January 30, 2016, 02:08:04 pm
Quite a difference in jet fu... oh nvm. It's exactly the same thing.
hmm ???

Also, doesn't even make sense to make such an example but okay
It makes perfect sense because the airplanes were very much different in 1945 when the empire state building accident happened?

The plane that flew into empire state building:
B-25H (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/B-25J_Mitchell_high_bank_80th.JPG/800px-B-25J_Mitchell_high_bank_80th.JPG)
Lenght: 16.13m
Wingspan: 20.6m
Empty weight: 8855kg
Maximum speed: 438km/h

The plane that flew into WTC
Boeing 767-200 (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/American_Airlines_767-200_N324AA.jpg)
Lenght: 48.51m
Wingspan: 57.6m
Empty weight: 80285.8kg
Maximum speed: 850km/h

Quite a difference in the building's constructions?
I was talking about the constructions of airplanes. But yes, the buildings are very different also. + no1 could design a building to survive airplane flying through it.
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Jonneh on January 30, 2016, 04:44:00 pm
jet fuel can't melt dank memes :kappa:
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Ekke on January 30, 2016, 07:14:57 pm
@martin, according to the official story the buildings collapsed because of the heat from the burning jet fuel soo plane's construction or speed doesn't mean a thing. And... how could no1 design such a building if empire state building survived it?

Wtc 7 owner Silverstein told in an interview that he gave the constructiom workers or w.e an order to "pull" (demolition) the tower, cause of the hopeless situation inside the tower..
he later "corrected" himself that he meant to "pull" the firefighters out of the building, lolwat?

Just spare my time martin, watch ulmefilm.ee part 1, 2 and then come back
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Il Skill L on January 30, 2016, 07:52:16 pm
soo plane's construction or speed doesn't mean a thing
It means everything. Plane crashed into the building, isn't it obvious that the weight, strenght and speed of the plane matter?

how could no1 design such a building if empire state building survived it?
The Boeing 767 is 10times larger than the B-25.. No wonder the Empire State Building has better chances of surviving.
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Ekke on January 31, 2016, 11:38:30 am
The official story stated that they fell because of the heat from the burning fuel not because of the impact... you are just creating your own story without even doing research

bls stop.
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Rockmanexe on February 01, 2016, 07:50:11 pm
iz fake ???  ??? ??? ::) ::) :o :o :-X :-X :o :o

jet fuel can't melt steel beams
I thought it was made by kyle though  ::)
you can't really tell, what was in  that building that it made the whole 2 towers collapsed, or it might actually has been planned for several political purposes
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Danielshapz on February 12, 2016, 06:30:03 am
jet fuel can't melt dank memes :kappa:

Jet fuel can't melt friendship :kappa:
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Icedrags on February 17, 2016, 01:45:20 pm


9/11 was fake yas !

Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Zeepleeuw on February 17, 2016, 02:06:19 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories 0:)
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Rocklal on February 18, 2016, 03:38:51 pm
it's also really hard to believe that a whole twin trade center would collapse, when it was hit by one plane  ??? ???.
like this seems off in every aspect.
#supportingdrugs
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Someone12116 on February 18, 2016, 06:12:17 pm
Try flying a plane into some bigass tower. Ez way of knowing if a tower would actually collapse and there would be no more need for arguments.
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Drugs on February 20, 2016, 12:57:28 pm
Idk I think it would incredibly hard to organize something like this and expect nobody to ever find out, because people in on it will be guility for the rest of their lives and would probably want to come out with truth before they die... evenmore how many psycopaths do you need to find to organize it, people who wont be guility, or let's asume everyone involved were executed later... they would probably realize it and simply not do it in the first place because they realize that they either; live with quilt for the rest of their lives, be executed... etc

Also, imo way too much of a shock factor to plan, they could have just flew those planes into some empty ground or something and call it a terrorist attack regardless, because people on the plane died but the plane didn't get to its destination... but no let's plan planes fly into towers in middle of a big ass City.

I haven't checked any of the facts but what war it was, iraq or something... that was based on false "nuclear threat" accusations... later they just said that it was false intel. They didn't need to fake 9/11 to go to iraq war, i doubt they needed to fake 9/11 for whatever reasons you believe it was faked for.
Title: Re: 9/11
Post by: Nightfall12 on March 08, 2016, 04:47:50 pm
Ask one question,

Would we have gone into the Middle East if this never happened?

No.. Japan did the same thing with China, when they blew up their own railroad, blaming the Chinese, = Propaganda, rally the people, everyone is agree'd to declare war, = Get what you want now with your people backing you.

= USA

History Repeats itself chaps, in many ways